Pragmatism and the Environment Essay

The environs is at stake. The world race we live in is a pass on of slow deaththat the world is dying everyday just as the world body loses body cells every minute. Every infixed choice of the world is continually abused without thought of the consequences. In a way, military personnel beings are that of a virus, a systemic biological specie that consumes an easy and relatively beneficial part, destroys it, moves on to a nonher area, and leaves the consumed, worthless, and decimated.However, military man bring teaches us that we gage non always deny the natural law because as intelligible beings opened of understanding, we induct the natural ability to adapt to whatever environment presumption and finding ways and means to survive. As such, the development of the gracious hurry is non possible if not for our natural inclination of adaptability, protection of species, and survival. In the essay Pragmatism and Environmental Thought by Kelly Parker (1996), she mentions what we must not try to do is not to master the natural world, but to moderate meaningful lives within various environments. This coincides with the natural law of adaptability, in which kind-hearted beings need not defy standards as defined by record but to harness it and provide necessary means of survival. Pragmatic experience and Environmental Issues Pragmatism heavily relies on factual understanding kind of than the complete belief in the intrinsic ideas of the human mind. William James, John Dewey, Charles Pierce, among former(a) founders of American realism during the start of the century, argued that in that respect are no innate beliefs in which knowledge is ground.This means that knowledge is not innately reverse upon the human mind. Rather, experience confirms this baseless knowledge through factual and concrete understandingthat an ideology is only accepted as true if it is to be found practical in application. Human experience is then the hind end of such pra cticality and its truthfulness is defined through practical solutions. The environment is not detached from the pragmatist or any other being. The environment is part of the experience, that thither is a symbiotic relationship among the two biological systems as well as other intent systems.Parker (1996) emphasized this point in her essay environment, in the most basic sense, is the field where experience occurs, where my life and the lives of others arise and take place (p. 29). Every circle must have definite bounds in which it interacts and from that interaction is where experience revolves. Through these experiences, on that point have been developments in the field concerning the environment, especially on moralisticity. The development of environmental ethics is based on the pragmatic movement.More specifically, the interaction between the two different world views of nature leads to the eventual development of these ethics. These ethics later become moral standards for p eople until they become a average of living for most. Based from these practical experiences, these social norms transform into methods of newer forms of social office and enhance environmental awareness such as new laws and legislations concerning the environment, basic activism, among others. The Ethical/Global Problem As inferred by the pragmatic view, pragmatisms role with the environment is more on application quite a than theorization.In a more general perspective, human beings have the natural tendency to abuse their surrounding and not to take into account their let actions against different ecological systems round them. This coincides with the disceptation on moral pluralism and anthropocentrism. deterrent example pluralism specifies no single moral principle or over-arching theory of what is powerful can be appropriately applied in all ethically problematic solutions (Parker, 1996, p. 31). There is no ultimate and essential set of moral laws governing every scenar io of moral problems.Because of the subjectivity of experience, it cannot be applied to any moral problem because of the lack of objectivity. In relation to environmental cases, there are different moral standards (i. e. , culture, geographical location) that must be taken into account in order for a set of moral/environmental laws to be applied. These different subjective inquiries on what should be protected, allowed, or prohibited come into a moral dilemmawhether it would be practical or not. Moral pluralism is also related to the problem of anthropocentrismthe prioritization of values for human beings.Human life is placed on greater importance earlier than other outside performers. In her article, Parker (1996) further explains this line of reasoning Again, this is not to say that human whim is the measure of all things, only that adult male are in fact the measurers. This must be a factor in all our deliberation in all environmental issues. We can and should speak on othe rs behalf when appropriate, but we cannot speak from their experience (p. 2). The essay proposes that we create standards and laws by speaking for ourselves and for the things that we want to protect based on our own experiences and judgment.For instance, the advocates of endangered species or an ecological subsystem represent their companionship to other human being. It is through the advocates that these creatures are represented in the debate over human need. The Global Challenge With the looming threat of global warming, babys room gas, and other ecological concerns, what we should do is concentrate more on strait-laced action and proper representation of all the numerous aspects of the environment. We have already identified several problems that cause environmental distress recently and from these problems, there should be a formulation of steps to quickly counteract these issues.If left(a) ignored or continually debated upon without any concrete formulas of implementation , these problems will pass over to grow until they become uncontrollable. The proper need of identifying these problems will foster in creating different strategies as well as formulating legal actions that will help protect and preserve environmental issues. The factual and general perspective is the world is dying and it continues to deteriorate as the number of human population increases. The proposition of proper action comes into play through the environmental advocacies all around the world that supports of revitalizing planet earth.However, there remains the fact that human beings generally view the environment as something that can be planted, created, destroyed, and recreated again. This rung implies that even with human intervention, the natural law of nature will calm down take its place. Society, especially today, should uplift to adapt and live harmoniously with the environment in order to create a symbiotic relationship between the two. We also have to address th e apathy of humans towards its environment.We should remove from the human mindset that the ecological system that we live in is not limitless and it will soon vanish if we are to let our actions not reflected upon. By examining our actions, we may come to a realization that everything that we do may adjoin the environment in ways that we might not even know. Removing this unconscious(p) reinforcement may well be one of the keys in resolving power our environmental problem. The depletion of our natural resources, the unnatural effects of greenhouses gases and the growing number of human population are just a few of many environmental issues that should be given importance.Although these problems are already experiencing drastic developments for the last half-dozen years, we already have the initiative and the technology to somehow lessen its plastered increase and may eventually, although not essentially eradicate, balance the gap between human state of living and the environme nt. Living with an ecological system, we must learn how to balance our actions and lifestyles in order to build a beneficial relationship. In this way, everybody wins.ReferenceParker, K. (1996) Pragmatism and Environmental Thought. In A. Light & E. Katz (Eds. ) Environmental Pragmatism. capital of the United Kingdom and New York Routledge (21-37).