Cultural Anthropology Comparison Essay Essay

Two authors published separate articles that discussed the set up of Technology on families and on bon ton in general. These articles are Technology and loving Change The Effects on Family and Community, compose by Jan English-Lueck in 1998 and Communication technologies that exit change our lives, written by whole wheat flour T. T. monitor lizard in 2003. However, while two authors discussed the same topic, which is how engine room generall(a)y affects the lives of people, they disaccord in the areas that they foc wee-weed on in their respective articles.Basically, English-Lueck, in his article, claimed that applied science has not actually adversely affected the charge family members communicate among each other, only when has or else enhanced it. According to him, the most world-shaking and most obvious impact of technology on a family is that a soulfulnesss working hours extend to his or her work substructure. In other words, a collectable to the massive enhancem ent of technology, a person brings his or her work home when he or she should be allocating that prison term for his or her family.Based on English-Luecks article, while this discount initially be viewed as a negative impact, the position is, technology has actually efficiently better the way family members communicate among each other. For example, a family camping trip open fire comfortably be planned in a single afternoon through the occasion of a pager or an electronic mail as compared to the conventional method of provision it over dinner. Moreover, according to the article, family members who spend most of their time at work commode regularly check if their children by page number them or calling them using a cellphone.In addition, a person can respond to emergency duties at work through by using a fax machine. In other words, English-Lueck in his article claims that it is wrong to assume that products of technology has negatively affected the family life since it th ey give birth actually made conference amongst members more convenient and more constant. On the other hand, Graham T. T. Monitors article focused on how fast technology has been increasing over the ago years and how this has lead to breaking calibrate barriers in communication.Basically, Monitor said that due to constant technological advancements, which he believes leave soon match the speed and business leader of the human brain, the society and families, both offspring and old, can easily access all types of digital communication devices that can alter them to communicate among themselves anywhere and anytime. According to him, this is perchance the most important effect on the family because it bridges the distance between family members or kin that are far away from each other. In other words, Monitor claims that the technology is improving so rapidly that people would never have to flummox about communication problems.In short, both authors claim that while tech nological advancements can initially appear overwhelming, it should not adversely affect the way families live their lives but rather improve it. According to them, as technology improves, families should adapt to these new changes and use them to their advantage. Furthermore, both English-Lueck and Montior agreed in formula that these technological enhancements make work, family management, and, most of all, communication more efficient and that these technological trends impart continue in the future.