Circulatory System Essay

His head start layer criticised Paleys doctrine of affinity of the train. The offset printing part of the analogy claimed that if you found a rock while walking d i a heath, you would not think anything of it. However, if you had seen a watch you would examine it and find that it had mournful parts that demonstrate that the watch has a purpose, the parts work together for a purpose and they are launched to clear the watch function because if they werent, the watch wont perform its function. He reason the first part of his analogy by fashion that the watch had a maker who must wipe out existed at rough time and place.The second part of the analogy claimed that if we suppose the watch had an some other imaginary number function, and this function was the producing of other watches, then our astonishment for the watchmaker would be increased. He decide this part of his pedigree by saying that any maven who finds such a watch would conclude that the name of the watch implies the presence of newsworthiness and mind. Paley verbalize that just want the watch being constructed necessitates a designer as an account of its existence, each(prenominal) of nature requires a much greater designer. The complexity of nature is far greater than any machine human beings git make and therefore a empyrean designer is needed, this designer is entireion. Hume criticised this point by saying that the analogy is limited. For character, you could conclude from a study of the human blood circulatory carcass that animals had the same system. This would be a weak and mistaken analogy but to compare a humans and an animals circulatory system to the way sap circulates in a plant.Hume maintained his criticism of Paleys analogy of the watch by an analogy of his own. This analogy said that we can conclude that a family had a constructor and an interior designer but we cannot, however, deduce a builder or architect of the foundation in the same way because t here is no similarity between the two. He menti unmatchabled that if the house is faulty, what does this suggest somewhat the designer? And so, if God did design the world, is hedirectly creditworthy for the evil within it? Paley, however, rejected this point because the issue was whether the universe exhibited signs of design. He was not concerned with questions relating to issues of quality concerning the design. Paleys repartee was criticised to be unsatisfactory.Hume argued that there are other possible explanations than God for apparent design in the universe. Hume claimed that one of these possible explanations power be that as salutary as the possibility that there is a gee designer of the universe, it is equally possible that topic whitethorn contain the spring of order originally within itself, as well as mind does and that unless there is perfect similarity between the object of similitude and what is being compared, you cannot draw a final result with any certaint y.Another possible explanation for apparent design in the universe susceptibility be that any achievement that we observe in nature may be caused by a human body of causes. This view supports the disco real of natural survival and the DNA and its role of shaping the evolution of all living organisms.Hume claimed that there mightiness not be just one single designer for the world. For example, we may look at a great venture and think about the great design of it, but the post may be the result of years, even generations of trial and error. The ship may be the product of numerous hands and not just one great designer. From this, Hume concludes that there is no manifest to suggest the unity of the deity.Hume suggested ternary more theories as explanations for the design of the universe aptness of analogy, the epicurean thesis and the argument from effect to cause.The aptness of analogy said that a watch is not a suitable analogy for the world. For example, just because a c abbage is fitted together/designed perfectly, does not mean that it has a maker/designer. By using a machine as an analogy, you would have already determined the issuing you want you want there to be a designer and youre already assuming that something natural, i.e. the cabbage, has a designer.The epicurean thesis was explained using an example. This example spoke about particles and said that if they were freely moving rough over infinite time, by chance, one of the combinations they make would just happen to constitute a abiding order and this stable order is what we now live in. This example represented the view that the universe might have happened by chance.The argument from effect to cause claimed that we cannot go from an effect to a greater cause than that needed to contract the cause. We cannot say whether he made the watch alone or had some undersize helpers. This would mean that we do not and cannot hunch over whether he is still active or even still alive, we can yet say if the universe does/doesnt have a designer and cant list its traits by saying that he is benevolent, omnipotent, omniscient and infinite as umteen would portray him.Overall, Hume criticises the teleological argument in a number of ways. He very explicitly criticises Paleys views on the teleological argument, using them to explain why he believes that the argument is deeply flawed.