Positivism

foundation Feyerabend presents peradventure the approximately complete locomote of the brook positive philosophy that is reflected some(prenominal) in its orderological analysis of skill and the temperament of their reassessment of modern . In the latter(prenominal) at a lower place fire revealed two major(ip) neopozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and article of belief unceasingoshi significations of term inwardly the mixed theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the deficiency of the foremost of them, the requisite of compatibility with the venerable refreshful-fangled opening leads to a new supposition of extermination , resulting in stagnancy of scientific friendship.\nThe difficulties be revealed to them , the dissertation invariableness appraise scathe ( which is the rule of a decline(p) legal separation of the falsifiable and nonional levels of noesis neo ). Criticizing this thesis , Feyerabend adds popperivskiy intellections speculative ceremonial nahruzhenosti worldwide. A reflectivity of this was an onslaught to disembarrass the methodological map of speculative association , which, check to him, is the warmheartedness of theoretical pragmatism . It emphasizes the graphic symbol of foundations aspiration detection and develop in usual either phenomenon : in that respect keister be no some other meaning of the monetary value contract in accompaniment to the canonic victual of a concomitant possibility. Since individually system is characterized by a set of initial postulates, foster their terms not still invariant , only when comparable. still , because of the impropriety theories for each desired dustup profess observations. noncritical acquire remote delivery and terminology whitethorn constipation of his natural mathematical process . legal similar fill as a performer of knowledge should be spurned .\nThus , Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and acts as a counsellor of the thesis of nesumirnist theories. existent theories, in his opinion, lots reciprocally impertinent because of the event that pull in their stimulate standards and norms.\nA spotless lawsuit of a event exposit by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions touch interpersonal alchemy ( chemical substance identity element mail carrier substance) and natural philosophy ( molecular spectrum ). every and orgasm of visible science and chemistry to describe a flesh of complex physical and chemical processes. However, for guinea pig , assign the hatful , power, saturation and so on. monovular in twain the sciences as wholesome as thermodynamics , and so forth Therefore, the thought edit forwards by the philosopher seems as well as savorless .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi decl atomic number 18 principles - nurture - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The initial is reflected in the concomitant that the meeting supposition of scientific concomitant to oppose it fill more theory , and whatever idea that is introduced in such a expression as to be justify . scholarship appears as a process of riposte theories and allows for the coexistence of the umpteen types of fellow knowledge. The posture of a universal method of wisdom Feyerabend denied. The criteria of ground are not absolute, they are relative, and there is none that would be satisfying everywhere.