.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Advise, Jenny, Billy, Edison and Melissa of their legal rights and obligations, if any.

The issue should be discussed is whether Billys letter should be a efficacious acceptance to Jennys plead. Where the offerer indicates that acceptance of the offer must be made by a particular method scarce (e.g. by post), the acceptance must be made by that particular method . As Jenny did make it genuinely(prenominal) name that she will only accept communication by holler during the tele phone conversation with Billy, pursuant to the rule, in this sideslip a valid acceptance must be a phone call. Therefore, Billys letter is not a valid acceptance. match to that, in that respect should not be a contract among Billy and Jenny. Consequently, I would advise Billy that he is very unlikely to be an owner of that prop. Edison There are a number of issues should be discussed between Edison and Jenny. The first issue should be discussed is whether the admit of Edison on Jenny to reduce the price of the property to $180,000 will disregard the offer from Jenny or not. It sho uld be noted that the demand of Edison is a replica offer. As a general rule, an offer remains open until it has been genuine, rejected, revoked or has pass . A counter offer is a rejection of an offer. The rejection of an offer by the offeree kills the offer. The offer comes to an end. It outhouse no longer be accepted by the offeree . In the case between Hyde and Wrench , on 6th June 1840, the defendant by his agent offered to sell his prove to the plaintiff for £1,200. The plaintiff by his agent refused. On the kindred day, the defendant by his agent offered to sell for £1,000. The plaintiff by his agent offered to buy for £950. The defendant asked for time to consider. On twenty-seventh June... If you want to eviscerate a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment